English
Español
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Projects
Researchers
Statistics
Investigación Indoamérica
English
Español
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
Have you forgotten your password?
Home
CRIS
Publications
Quito'S Urban Imaginaries: Between Conserved and Intervened Green Spaces
Export
Statistics
Options
Quito'S Urban Imaginaries: Between Conserved and Intervened Green Spaces
Journal
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Date Issued
2021
Author(s)
Montero, D.
Estrella A.
Oleas N.
Cruz J.
Salazar L.
Santos F.
Bonilla Bedoya, Santiago
Centro de Investigación para el Territorio y el Hábitat Sostenible
Type
Conference Paper
DOI
10.1088/1755-1315/690/1/012055
URL
https://cris.indoamerica.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8700
Abstract
This manuscript presents the results of field research aimed to identify the perceptions that condition the urban imaginaries addressing the green spaces in Quito, Ecuador. Two focus groups were carried out with experts in designing green spaces. The results were evaluated through discourse analysis, applying the dialectical hermeneutical method, to finally establish open, axial, and selective categories. Six categories allow the understanding of the imaginaries associated with the city's green spaces: conserved or intervened spaces, public and private spaces, and individual and collective subjectivity in relation to green areas; also relevant are the interventions of actors such as the state, the real estate market, and the community in the management of these spaces. In the city, conserved green spaces, such as urban and peri-urban forests, are for contemplative use and would be less attractive to the population than provoked green spaces, the latter of which are characterized by facilitating human interaction and by having the direct intervention of public institutions. The identification of public and private green spaces was related to potential forms of urban segregation. Participants stated that privileged social groups have direct access to customized architectural designs, whereas community organizations manage these spaces through social action. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Scopus© citations
1
Acquisition Date
Jun 6, 2024
View Details
Views
2
Acquisition Date
Nov 20, 2024
View Details
google-scholar
View Details
Downloads
View Details