Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Promise, Mimicry, and Surveillance: Responsibly Integrating Artificial Intelligence With Socratic Inquiry in Medical Education
Details

Promise, Mimicry, and Surveillance: Responsibly Integrating Artificial Intelligence With Socratic Inquiry in Medical Education

Journal
JMIR Medical Education
ISSN
23693762
Date Issued
2026-09-10
Author(s)
Sánchez Redrobán, José  
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Bienestar Humano  
Type
Article
DOI
10.2196/102958
URL
https://cris.indoamerica.edu.ec/handle/123456789/10257
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly proposed as a way to deliver Socratic dialogue at scale in medical education, offering personalized, always-available, and lower-stakes inquiry that human educators cannot logistically provide. In this viewpoint, I argue that this promise is plausible but unproven and that 2 failure modes deserve more attention than they currently receive. The first is the mimicry trap: a system that fluently generates Socratic-sounding questions can appear to cultivate reasoning while functioning as interactive content delivery. I position this as an educational instance of the ELIZA effect and of the proxy-outcome problem; separating conversational mimicry from genuine metacognitive gain remains a central unresolved evaluation problem. The second is what I term the Panopticon Paradox: the data collection that makes AI tutoring effective may erode the psychological safety that Socratic inquiry requires, pushing learners toward performative rather than authentic engagement, in a manner analogous to gaming behaviors documented in intelligent tutoring systems. I present this second construct as a testable causal model with specified mediators, moderators, and falsifiable predictions rather than as an established finding. Because the evidence base is dominated by proof-of-concept tools, cross-sectional surveys, and short-term evaluations, I argue that AI is complementary rather than a replacement technology, and I propose a 3-pillar framework (governance, curriculum, and faculty development) tied explicitly to the 2 failure modes. I distinguish 4 modalities of delegation and argue that ethical deliberation, emotionally complex communication, and ambiguous clinical judgment cannot presently be recommended for autonomous or primary AI delivery. © 2026 JMIR Publications Inc.. All rights reserved.
Subjects

AI

clinical reasoning

educational ethics

large language models...

learning analytics

medical education

Socratic method

Investigación Indoamérica

Logo Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica
  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4science

COAR Notify